Prominent California Eviction Law Firm Under Fire For Artificial Intelligence Laced Court Filings

A Los Angeles County judge has sanctioned a prominent California eviction law firm. Dennis P. Block & Associates submitted an AI-generated court document containing fictitious and fabricated case law. The filings have now spurred a debate on ethical consequence do using artificial intelligence in legal proceedings. Dennis P. Block & Associates is a self-proclaimed “leading eviction law firm” in the state.

The filings now raise concerns about accountability and integrity in eviction cases. As our readers are well aware, these outcomes have major consequences for vulnerable renters.

AI tools like ChatGPT hold the potential for efficiency gains. However, experts warn they require diligent supervision to prevent factual inaccuracies or distortion. For overburdened housing courts, the pressure to process bulging caseloads swiftly may incentivize attorneys to cut corners. Thus, having the law firm risk violating ethics and duties owed to the court.

The judges in several of the cases actually did their job and looked up the case law. That is when they made the shocking discovery. They found various case laws that were either wholly invented or irrelevant to eviction statutes.

The format, language, and legitimately referenced cases initially obscured the flaws. That was until it was put under scrutiny. The filing’s similarities with a ChatGPT-sourced brief from another state stirred the judge’s suspicions. Upon further inspection, it became obvious that Block’s firm had siphoned the document from a generative AI assistant without verification.

Did The California Eviction Law Firm Violate Legal Ethics By Using AI?

The exposure of baseless cases, known as AI “hallucinations,” violates an attorney’s basic obligation to ensure factual precision when citing legal precedent.

The stakes intensify for unrepresented tenants in a housing crisis. Therefore, the use of AI heightens calls for expanded access to counsel in eviction hearings.

Calls have intensified for expanded access to tenant lawyers as eviction filings soar beyond pre-pandemic levels. Several California municipalities are weighing proposals offering free counsel in housing court to level the playing field. These measures could curb the incentive to cut corners driven by overwhelming caseloads if implemented. They may also deter submissions grounded in AI rather than law.

Block has built a reputation for handling landlord disputes. However, the sanction follows a trail of dissatisfied clients leveling malpractice complaints.

Generative language models like ChatGPT can produce persuasive content. However, it lacks a grounded understanding of reality to confirm the accuracy of their output. Despite projecting confidence and detail, these AI systems invent claims that lack meaningful analysis and risk consequences when deployed without oversight and accountability.

The nature of eviction court concentrates risk by encouraging volume over rigor. This is similar to the “Rocket Docket” after the 2008 financial crisis.

The court sanction falls short of triggering a referral to the state bar for potential discipline. However, it delivered a sharp warning to ensure diligence when invoking legal precedent.

Read More About Evictions And Foreclosures On MFI-Miami.com.